PolitiFact rated Donalds' claim about Florida's new data center law Half True: it directs a process, not a result, and it doesn't cover rural co-ops or municipal utilities at all. Meanwhile the backers of four Florida data center projects have given him $894,000.
Fitzpatrick is one of only two Republicans who voted against the final budget bill. On May 22, 2025, when the same bill passed the House 215-214, he voted yes. CBO said the version he backed would cut $863 billion from Medicaid and CHIP.
Three weeks into the job, South Carolina's appointed senator says she'd blow up the filibuster to pass the SAVE Act — the opposite of her brother's position. Her introductory ad is two culture-war lines. Her primary is August 11.
Former Sen. Jeff Flake and the Republican mayors of Valdosta and Tifton all crossed party lines to back Jon Ossoff. Meanwhile a coalition of Atlanta Black pastors is demanding Collins answer for his campaign's reported ties to white nationalists.
Palmer's own argument was that most improper payments come from agencies failing to verify eligibility. On August 6, the GAO reported that DOGE had not given it enough information to verify 96% of DOGE's claimed grant savings — and did not respond to GAO's requests for information.
In 2025 Gary Palmer voted against the environment on every vote the League of Conservation Voters scored. The same year he was handed the gavel of the subcommittee that oversees America's air and water — with a coal company, a power company and a quarry company on his donor list.
"I own that. I said I would serve only five terms." Then Palmer said he prayed for clarity and got a different answer. Alabama's 6th District votes August 11 — and his campaign didn't respond to more than a dozen interview requests.
She wrote an op-ed cheering DOGE, and a bill to hand outside auditors a permanent role in deciding which parts of the government to close. Then the GAO found DOGE couldn't verify its numbers — and wouldn't talk to the auditors.
Her one-page appeal letter to the House Ethics Committee claimed a mask requirement violated her First Amendment rights and that the fine violated the Twenty-Seventh Amendment. The committee turned her down.